This is why I don´t like Registration/Pay walls, I think my comment is important and the writer put a register/pay wall, nevertheless, since I said I was going to read some of the links in the Post I commented to, here it is, this was supposed to by my comment to a reference claiming Cell Phones are culprits in cognitive performance decline, I guess, of Students?:
"And it is a low ball park, it seems those measurements you quote are self reported meaning the interviewed are aware of their behavior/difficulties which is not always the case, specially in addicts, kind of counter narrating."
"There is one thing, in many risks/harms there is a threshold effect: below certain levels of exposure there is no risk, the risk is not significantly different, or is acceptable given the benefit."
"It is important for collaboration, if the threshold is too low or not there at all: there is no threshold for harm, then collaboration most likely won´t be possible, even if it´s lacking involves the harm of minors or a large swath of Adult Population."
My comment referred to a 20-25% self reported inability to concentrate and trouble understanding.
The other two paragraphs referred to the possibility of some Companies doing something to mitigate the risk/exposure of using their products.
Now, according to my Guidelines I will block the author, I find it ironic he/she wonders about collaboration from, he/she said Tech companies when I must work harder to inform him of something relevant of which perhaps he/she does not know.
No wonder no one apparently fixes anything including me...
Oh, surprise!, I already had blocked the writer, double, and the other links I was supposed to read, that now I won´t, are from the same author do not allow comments, or redirect, triple and quadruple...
It seems college professors also suck lemons from the intellectual lemon world...
This is why I don´t like Registration/Pay walls, I think my comment is important and the writer put a register/pay wall, nevertheless, since I said I was going to read some of the links in the Post I commented to, here it is, this was supposed to by my comment to a reference claiming Cell Phones are culprits in cognitive performance decline, I guess, of Students?:
"And it is a low ball park, it seems those measurements you quote are self reported meaning the interviewed are aware of their behavior/difficulties which is not always the case, specially in addicts, kind of counter narrating."
"There is one thing, in many risks/harms there is a threshold effect: below certain levels of exposure there is no risk, the risk is not significantly different, or is acceptable given the benefit."
"It is important for collaboration, if the threshold is too low or not there at all: there is no threshold for harm, then collaboration most likely won´t be possible, even if it´s lacking involves the harm of minors or a large swath of Adult Population."
My comment referred to a 20-25% self reported inability to concentrate and trouble understanding.
The other two paragraphs referred to the possibility of some Companies doing something to mitigate the risk/exposure of using their products.
Now, according to my Guidelines I will block the author, I find it ironic he/she wonders about collaboration from, he/she said Tech companies when I must work harder to inform him of something relevant of which perhaps he/she does not know.
No wonder no one apparently fixes anything including me...
Oh, surprise!, I already had blocked the writer, double, and the other links I was supposed to read, that now I won´t, are from the same author do not allow comments, or redirect, triple and quadruple...
It seems college professors also suck lemons from the intellectual lemon world...
Thanks for engaging with my piece and for the interesting insight into educational conditions in Mexico.
I also described Educational and Other conditions in the US, but thanks for the comment...